Thread subject: CroydonPool.com - The CDPL Online Community :: Division 1 Singles Play Offs - 17/05

Posted by Site Team on 08-05-2011 15:08
#1

The play offs for Division 1 Singles/Runners up will take place at The Farley, Thornton Heath on Tuesday 17/05

They will be between:

Tony Jackson - The Patriots v Metin Tomris - The Eagles
Ricky Cook - The Patriots v Gary Swettenham - The Propeller

Edited by Site Team on 10-05-2011 05:50

Posted by Kermy on 09-05-2011 21:28
#2

Cant believe there is a play-off for this,we turn up week in week out for our teams,have a good season then could lose what we have played for on a 1 frame ko basis.Actually u could lose with the toss of a coin,considering the players that are left. Makes a mockery of the divisional singles.

Edited by Kermy on 09-05-2011 21:32

Posted by Shaggy on 09-05-2011 21:45
#3

Before there were runners up trophies there were definately many occasions that the trophy was shared. However the league did provide only one trophy and the cost of the additonal trophies were shared between the players involved. Was this offered as an option????

And in all honesty a Divisonal Title that only takes into account only half the games you are capable of playing is a bit of a mockery in itself anyway.

Posted by Kermy on 09-05-2011 21:51
#4

Not everyone plays twice everyweek,paul. so i understand y its done on first games only. And no it wasnt offered as an option.

Posted by Shaggy on 09-05-2011 22:29
#5

For sure, almost every league I know use percentages win minimum frame criteria. In reality you can win 50% of your games and actually be classed as being unbeaten.

My idea of the best player is the person that contributtes the most to the team to try to win the league andour system doesn;t necessarily support that. Saying that with the names at the top of the divisons this year I am sure that most of them will also have a very good second frame record. Just a thought.

In addition more frames has its merits, but the thing that tickles me is that their is a draw to play each other. Surely a 4 way round robin will be more appropriate if its played at all. At least its still a league format and will mean an additonal frame each.

Edited by Shaggy on 09-05-2011 22:34

Posted by Kermy on 09-05-2011 22:44
#6

I would of thought it would of been a round robin. Yet the draw has been done,surely that shouldve been done on the night. Something smells fishy about all this.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 01:20
#7

If im honest i was kind of looking forward to the knockout just for the buzz of it but do think that whoever loses will still say they won the individuals so its a bit meaningless for that reason.
Round Robin would be a better format if its done....Skelly had a idea for the trophy side of things and im sure everyone in eagles would agree the we would happily give our trophies up for that league cup semi match we lost to make the other 2 trophies if knowone wants to play. I dont mind either way!!

Posted by Big Ben Ten on 10-05-2011 01:36
#8

While we're on the topic of div singles alterations, surely you should get a greater reward for winning a frame in the 1st or 10th frame then someone who wins in the 7th frame....

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 01:45
#9

U have hit the nail on the head metin,it is meaningless. Nice offer from sean,but i think we will have to wait for the powers that be to sort it. Knew u would want to play seeing as its over one frame. Ha Ha.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 01:54
#10

hahahaha i would play it over 5 if u like......

Posted by longshanks on 10-05-2011 02:05
#11

Big Ben Ten - Why? A point is a point whether it's the first, second or last game.

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 02:08
#12

Anytime met,anytime.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 02:13
#13

lol name it ricky!!!!!
Ben- i c where your comin from but no and i played at no1 all season and dont agree, the quality is usually similar throughout the team so doesnt make a difference even if its the hardest position at number1 (not 10 though)

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 02:30
#14

Suppose there's a first time for everything. Im sure ull beat me one day met. Have to agree with u on the ben ten thing. not sure he knows what his talking about.

Posted by longshanks on 10-05-2011 02:36
#15

If you got more points for playing 1 and 10 Jacko would play 1 and 10 every week.

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 02:52
#16

Jacko there for 1st frame.that would be a sight for sore eyes.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 02:54
#17

Kermy wrote:
Jacko there for 1st frame.that would be a sight for sore eyes.

:D:

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 02:59
#18

im jinxed against u, i seem to play *******!!! still would back myself in a long race to when there's cash on it!!!

Posted by Big Ben Ten on 10-05-2011 03:03
#19

Must be different in different divisions then. I played in div 3 and the guys at the top of div singles are not the best guys in the league.

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 03:03
#20

Not jinxed mate,just not good enough. HeHe.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 03:13
#21

:lol: i'll look forward to cheeky money match then:boxer:

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 03:16
#22

Big Ben Ten wrote:
Must be different in different divisions then. I played in div 3 and the guys at the top of div singles are not the best guys in the league.
Thats a bit harsh ben,old hersey can play a bit and his played in div 1.Saxton is also up there,he can bore u to tears but can still play the game. Div 1 standard is good,but if u gotta team with a regular 8 or 9 players the weaker ones are normally at the end.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 03:18
#23

agree with kermit and dont forget its 1 frame pool so any1 can have a good year as its proved coz jackos up there:bite:

Posted by Big Ben Ten on 10-05-2011 03:24
#24

Wasnt singling anyone out and was looking at some of the people lower down that should be higher rather then the other way round but I guess not everyone can be at the top. However I think most people would agree that there is a greater range of talent in the leagues other then div 1 therefore making it harder to beat a teams number 1 them their number 7. Although I make Metin right in the sense that there is quality throughout most div 1 teams making each frame as hard as the next.

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 03:30
#25

Big Ben Ten wrote:
Wasnt singling anyone out and was looking at some of the people lower down that should be higher rather then the other way round but I guess not everyone can be at the top. However I think most people would agree that there is a greater range of talent in the leagues other then div 1 therefore making it harder to beat a teams number 1 them their number 7. Although I make Metin right in the sense that there is quality throughout most div 1 teams making each frame as hard as the next.
Most of us have played in the lower leagues ben,and most of us want to play better pool. It has certainly helped me playing better players week in week out. Althogh i wouldnt put met up there.

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 03:32
#26

metin250 wrote:
:lol: i'll look forward to cheeky money match then:boxer:
I dont take any turkish lira mate,only sterling.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 03:41
#27

Kermy wrote:
metin250 wrote:
:lol: i'll look forward to cheeky money match then:boxer:
I dont take any turkish lira mate,only sterling.

how about algerian dinar????lol

Posted by Big Ben Ten on 10-05-2011 03:43
#28

Was just a point I thought was worth a discussion on here as it's come up in conversation a few times on Tuesday nights. Tbh the leagues all about team results anyway, div singles Is secondary.

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 03:44
#29

metin250 wrote:
Kermy wrote:
metin250 wrote:
:lol: i'll look forward to cheeky money match then:boxer:
I dont take any turkish lira mate,only sterling.

how about algerian dinar????lol
:nerner:That'll do.

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 03:46
#30

would nt matter u would nt see any of it lol:D:

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 03:52
#31

:blah::blah::blah::blah::blah::blah:

Posted by Site Team on 10-05-2011 05:51
#32

Correction - the play offs are to be held at The Farley, Thornton Heath NOT Rileys Purley Way

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 14:01
#33

At the farley now,bet that pleases u met. Im lovin it.:drunk:

Posted by Teach on 10-05-2011 16:20
#34

I agree that the play-offs should not be settled over 1 frame - it has to be best of 3 as an absolute minimum!!

Posted by Kermy on 10-05-2011 16:50
#35

Best of 3,round robin i think would be best. Not sure i fancy givin up a tuesday night just for a possible 1 game of pool. If we r gonna do this lets make a night of it.:drunk:

Posted by Metin250 on 10-05-2011 17:00
#36

Kermy wrote:
At the farley now,bet that pleases u met. Im lovin it.:drunk:

:gettinghanged:
ok well that puts jacko/swetts fav as they r fudgetastic!! needs to be a longer nite which im sure we can sort out between us on the nite. if we are playing this then maybe do 2 frames round robin, each get a break each and the 1 with the most frames wins.
But i am dead against this whole thing now because it has become even more of a lottery!
Lets just flip a coin and be done with it!!

Posted by Cyber The Crucifier on 10-05-2011 18:07
#37

Think it should be best of 5 in both matches then both winners play best of 7

Edited by Cyber The Crucifier on 10-05-2011 18:15

Posted by Kermy on 11-05-2011 01:28
#38

Whats made u change ur mind met,as for u cyber,dont get yourself involved in things u dont understand.

Posted by Mr Cee on 11-05-2011 04:21
#39

kermy thats not nice cyber was merely stating his opinion however it would take 5 frames for him to get over losing the 1st
:bite:

i would have thought draw the 4 names out the hat with a best of 3 and a break each if it goes to 1-1 then flick for deciding break winner's of the 2 groups then play for winners and runners up....!

best of luck to

Gary
Mev
Ricky
Tony

For the div 1 singles winner/runner-up title



Posted by Metin250 on 11-05-2011 05:25
#40

Kermy wrote:
Whats made u change ur mind met,as for u cyber,dont get yourself involved in things u dont understand.

1.Coz iv gotta go to thornton heath!
2.We r playin 2 frames max.
3.On very average tables.
4.meaningless.
5.yours and jacko's home venue.
6.even if won u have still drawn.
7.could go all the way there to not even play a shot.
8.miss eastenders.
9.have top get a bus there.
10.have to get a bus home.
11. have to hide my phone incase of some1 wanting to mug me.
need to wear a stab vest!!!

im out!!! that enough??

Posted by Metin250 on 11-05-2011 05:28
#41

p.s.Mr Cee my name is metin not mev , he plays for unpredict and is number 2 turk in croydon!!!!

Posted by Cyber The Crucifier on 11-05-2011 19:13
#42

Im only saying my view OK

Posted by andye on 11-05-2011 19:46
#43

you can't have 4 winners, 2 yes but not 4!
each week you play the one frame so you can't suddenly make it best of 3, 5, 7 etc
i do agree a round robin should decide it rather than a k.o. but you still might not get an outright winner

it's obviously something that needs to be thought about in the future, maybe if level then it goes on your 2 frame wins?

it's a bit unfair that it's not at a more neutral venue...

Posted by Metin250 on 11-05-2011 20:03
#44

andye wrote:
you can't have 4 winners, 2 yes but not 4!
each week you play the one frame so you can't suddenly make it best of 3, 5, 7 etc
i do agree a round robin should decide it rather than a k.o. but you still might not get an outright winner

it's obviously something that needs to be thought about in the future, maybe if level then it goes on your 2 frame wins?

it's a bit unfair that it's not at a more neutral venue...

oi esser keep your wig out of it!!! not everyone played 2 frames each week u spazz. you have other motives for wanting a playoff as u told me so ssshhhhhhhhhhh!!!:threaten:

Posted by andye on 11-05-2011 20:11
#45

lol...

hence 'to be thought about in the future'

shaggy mentioned it should be about value to your team etc
i suggested maybe be if level it could go to % or % of 2nd frames
personally i think it should be % of wins of all frames you play providing you play 75% of the fixtures... at the moment it's hard to win it if you go on holiday...!!!

Posted by Viper on 12-05-2011 21:53
#46

Lots of interesting comments about changes to the competition set up ...... I'm just wondering whether something concrete will be prepared for a proposal in September where changes can be made as they cannot be made by opinions on here but Andy Esgrove seems to be on the right lines with his train of thought!!

Posted by Metin250 on 17-05-2011 00:06
#47

:hugs:So is this still going ahead coz I heard we were all getting a trophy which means I get Tuesday off from going to tornton heat!!!! Please let it be true!!!

Posted by Spud on 17-05-2011 22:01
#48

I had a conversation with Mark via email, and I confirmed that we (The Eagles) would forfeit our League Cup Semi Final Trophies to compensate for the cost of getting 4 joint winners trophies for the Individuals.

I think finishing top of the 1st division over the course of the Winter League is a far greater achievement than getting booted in the semi's of the cup, and thus deserves to be honoured.

Met's one of ours too, so it's a means to an end, although I know Met was relishing getting the bus over TH for 1 frame :-)


Posted by Metin250 on 17-05-2011 22:29
#49

Quote "although I know Met was relishing getting the bus over TH for 1 frame :-)"
No that would have been for 2 frames mr Kelly dont forget I had as good as a bye in the semi !!!!!:lol:

Posted by nuttmeg on 19-05-2011 03:46
#50

Spud wrote:
I had a conversation with Mark via email, and I confirmed that we (The Eagles) would forfeit our League Cup Semi Final Trophies to compensate for the cost of getting 4 joint winners trophies for the Individuals.

I think finishing top of the 1st division over the course of the Winter League is a far greater achievement than getting booted in the semi's of the cup, and thus deserves to be honoured.

Met's one of ours too, so it's a means to an end, although I know Met was relishing getting the bus over TH for 1 frame :-)

I absolutely love that x x