Posted by Bink286 on 10-06-2009 23:36
#14
Fat-Dart wrote:
Bink286 wrote:
... if a player is seemingly taking longer than 'necessary' in the opinion of the ref then they should be politely asked to get on with it.
So how would that be enforced without a stopwatch?
All that would happen then is arguments, without a doubt. You can't leave timing up to a ref's 'opinion'.
We leave plenty of other decisions to a ref's opinion. A stopwatch should really be the last resort to resolve any argument about the unreasonable 'hurry up' a ref might be accused of making.