Thread subject: CroydonPool.com - The CDPL Online Community :: Charles Burrows v Danny Evans

Posted by Golden on 12-10-2007 18:34
#1

Ok . . I'll take the bait . .

Charley my boy . . Whatever you can get together I'll get matched . . Two-leg match . . Best of 21 Pool and Best of 11 Snooker . . Winner takes all . .

If anyone wants a piece of this I'll give them 100% return . .

Posted by longshanks on 12-10-2007 18:37
#2

What happens if it's one win each?

Posted by Lils on 12-10-2007 18:39
#3

Then they play SUDDEN DEATH Scissors, Paper, Stone . . .
In all seriousness, if it goes 1-1, then maybe they should play 9 ball. It's not a game Danny plays and I doubt this other person does either, so it'd be fair I suppose.

Whatever is chosen, I'll have a couple of hundred on this please. It'll soon be Xmas and all extra money counts . . . .

Edited by Lils on 12-10-2007 18:55

Posted by ThePower on 12-10-2007 19:10
#4

This is a ridiculous money match, so one sided and there is only ever going to be one winner. Has all the makings of a no contest. Brings back memories and I know now how Berty must have felt.

Posted by berty on 12-10-2007 19:20
#5

5-2 up top hat game over

Posted by ThePower on 12-10-2007 19:24
#6

The best fluke I have played. I won comfortably in the end with plenty still left in the locker. Anyway its a closed subject because you have no bum for a rematch. :bite:

Posted by berty on 12-10-2007 19:32
#7

Fair play alex at 5-2 down with your head up your arse in the toilets and after the match you said if you hadn't of got that fluke you would have lost it altogether. Anyhoop always said the best player won on the day but with plenty left I very much doubt that.

I think it is usually fair to say someone has no bum if they dont take the original bet which I did (for increased money ?250 of my own cash). To deny a rematch after graciously taking defeat I think is perfectly acceptable.

Anyway I am no mercenary my team is all I care about on which I think you will find we currently own your asses!

:whip:

Posted by Burn on 12-10-2007 19:33
#8

Who is Charlie? Is this the fella that finished above Saxton, with 1 win out of 15 in the Singles League?

If so, this game is the cuesports equivalent of Terry Poynter versus Mike Tyson. :eek2:

Edited by Burn on 12-10-2007 19:35

Posted by ThePower on 12-10-2007 19:36
#9

If you can live with it Berty for the rest of your life then whom am I to argue. For the record, at 5-2 down I was toying with you.

Posted by Coneycueist on 12-10-2007 19:40
#10

:bored:

Posted by berty on 12-10-2007 19:40
#11

mathforum.org/~davidt/alex/booboo5.jpg

Posted by berty on 12-10-2007 19:45
#12

www.vixenamerica.com/images/In_Database/FlatZoom_5_15x17_Pocket_sq530px.jpg

Posted by Golden on 12-10-2007 20:02
#13

berty wrote:
5-2 up top hat game over

Cocked Hat

Posted by ThePower on 12-10-2007 20:03
#14

Enough, this is not our thread Berty. I think we should agree to never mention our money match again. Its in the past. For those who did not know the final result it was 11-8. Berty lost because his bum went. I won because it was always going to be that way. Berty does not want a rematch because he is a Coney homo. There you go, never going to talk about it again. All forgotten.

Posted by Coneycueist on 12-10-2007 20:09
#15

:lol:

Posted by ThePower on 12-10-2007 20:15
#16

Golden wrote:
berty wrote:
5-2 up top hat game over

Cocked Hat


Executed wrongly, its the most confidence sapping shot to deliver.....

Posted by berty on 12-10-2007 21:37
#17

:zzz:

Posted by the-shark on 14-10-2007 22:44
#18

i think charlie boy has got to much money lol. good luck tho

Posted by Lils on 15-10-2007 05:08
#19

It also appears that Mr Burrows was online in the early hours of this morning, but had nothing to say on this thread . . .

. . Come on Chuckie - surely a man who posted this:

" Chuckie
Shouted on: October 08 2007 19:54:51
Snooker is a Mans game compared to a game formed for little kids whom couldnt reach the tables! "

Isn't going to refuse the challenge of a mere pool player? And at your own game also?! :bite:



Posted by mickeyp on 15-10-2007 06:38
#20

Berty, The power... get your own room..... sorry, your own forum....:nerner:

Posted by longshanks on 15-10-2007 15:22
#21

Lils wrote:
It also appears that Mr Burrows was online in the early hours of this morning, but had nothing to say on this thread . . .

. . Come on Chuckie - surely a man who posted this:

" Chuckie
Shouted on: October 08 2007 19:54:51
Snooker is a Mans game compared to a game formed for little kids whom couldnt reach the tables! "

Isn't going to refuse the challenge of a mere pool player? And at your own game also?! :bite:





I think he's hiding in his burrow.

Edited by longshanks on 15-10-2007 15:23

Posted by Lils on 15-10-2007 17:37
#22

Ba-boom; CHHHHHHHH!! :lol: :judge:

Posted by Chuckie on 16-10-2007 06:34
#23

oh I never realised you've made a thread about it! sorry... Yeah, I'm up for the challenge!

Posted by Farley on 16-10-2007 06:47
#24

Chassling... you are tops...:clap:

Posted by andye on 16-10-2007 14:12
#25

danny won their last clash 9-3 which i think was a flattering scoreline and this match will be a lot closer... chuckie can pot like the best of them so i fancy him to take evans out in the snooker leg of the challenge!... this could well go down to a 9 ball match decider!!!

Posted by ThePower on 16-10-2007 15:28
#26

Its a no contest.


Posted by the-shark on 16-10-2007 23:18
#27

great the way mr esgrove is trying to make a for gone conclusion dramatic.:lol:::