Posted by Golden on 23-09-2008 22:45
#45
I totally agree but we all know it's gone well past that so it won't be seen as anything other than being personal . .
Earlier in this thread that I posted a sensible and legitimate question which went without reply yet there's a quick enough reply when there are posts of a different nature . . Why wasn't my original post replied to? Is it because Harry's entry was known about and kept quiet? Is it because, as per a conversation with Charles Burrows weeks ago, that the competition was over half full already regardless of the fact that the competition listing was empty when advertised on this site?
Even if the reply is "Danny you're not welcome at the Farley" or "What the fcuk has it got to do with you" then at least I know where I stand as we're all adults after all.
My post regarding Harry's entry came after this post
Golden wrote:
Is this still Division Two and below for both Winter and Summer?
Also, is the plate free-to-enter or is there an additional fee?
I get no reply to that and then see a Division One player played in the competition yet for bringing it up I get branded a "pathetic c*nt" by one individual . .
. . I know for an absolute fact that it would have been brought up by someone if it were a competition that I were involved in as it's happened before.
My post isn't aimed at Harry as being a Division One standard player I'd love to enter a competition full of lower league players given half the chance . . It's aimed at the principle behind it all . . As you have said, Dave is entitled to run his competitions as he sees fit but when they're advertised publicly then surely there is an element of accountability somewhere?
Edited by TheSaxtonator on 23-09-2008 22:49