|
If you could change something . .
|
| the flash |
Posted on 06-07-2008 22:12
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 128
Joined: 05.10.07
|
spotted cue balls and everyone has to use a racker !!!
because i can |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 07-07-2008 16:38
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
I'd change it so people who make posts on here late at night (probably when drunk) can't delete them the next day.  |
| |
|
|
| JugglingSpence |
Posted on 07-07-2008 18:46
|
Home From Home
Posts: 271
Joined: 05.10.07
|
I'd like to see a rule similar to the 'miss rule' in snooker, either having the option of putting your opponent back in to play or a free ball after every foul. Well, anything that stops people gaining an advantage by stepping outside of the rules for a shot. After your opponent fouls you shouldn't be returning to the table and thinking 'I'm still  here.
As happy as a single man living above a chip shop |
| |
|
|
| Lils |
Posted on 07-07-2008 19:05
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 674
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Hmmm.. But that totally defeats the object of the deliberate foul rule Spence, you big gay bear.
If you're fcuked with 2 shots, then you should have thought ahead and played accordingly. These rules are can be tactically genius, which is why they are a great leveller for people who aren't so good at potting but have the brain to think a few shots ahead.
Of course, if you can't pot and are a little simple (Not naming anyone, Spencer Barnes . . ) then you deserve to return to the table with two shots and be fcuked!!
  |
| |
|
|
| Bink286 |
Posted on 08-07-2008 18:06
|
Getting The Hang Of It
Posts: 38
Joined: 22.06.08
|
Venues that don't sell proper beer (as opposed to poxy lager) should be deemed completely inappropriate to host league or cup games, and a 0-10 walkover given to the visiting team until they start serving proper beer on tap.
Venues that have taps for proper beer that fail to actually serve said beer, or serve said beer in a manner that can only be described as cloudy muck, tasting like flat washing up liquid, should be suspended from hosting games, and teams based in such establishments should be moved to Rileys on Imperial Way until their landlord 'sorts it out'.
I resent spending my hard earned wedge on gnats' piss and or to line the pockets of landlords/management who cannot even begin to manage the basic principles for keeping, maintaining and serving proper ale.
Until these rules are brought in, I'm just going to keep driving to away venues and paying through the nose for mixers and cordials, making the landlords/management even more money and providing plenty of disincentive for them to not bother with changing anything at all whilst they rake in the profits from watered down over-priced limonades.
So there! |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 08-07-2008 18:12
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
 |
| |
|
|
| Faz Da Fisher |
Posted on 08-07-2008 20:25
|
Home From Home
Posts: 299
Joined: 08.07.08
|
Definetly bring in the time limit rule whether it is a minute or 90 seconds the games will go quicker and some venues are absoulotely appaling some tables need to be checked by officators of the CDPL as it is a disgrace to the game to play on table that is not worthy
FARLEY FARLEY !!!!!!! best tables better than suzzzzzzzys |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 08-07-2008 20:28
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
 |
| |
|
|
| andye |
Posted on 08-07-2008 20:40
|
Home From Home
Posts: 394
Joined: 02.10.07
|
i do think tables should have to come up to scratch... trouble is you'd end up with hardly any venues and the whole league would probably be played at suzy q's...!!! |
| |
|
|
| Shaggy |
Posted on 08-07-2008 21:19
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 888
Joined: 02.10.07
|
fazz4eva wrote:
Definetly bring in the time limit rule whether it is a minute or 90 seconds the games will go quicker and some venues are absoulotely appaling some tables need to be checked by officators of the CDPL as it is a disgrace to the game to play on table that is not worthy
FARLEY FARLEY !!!!!!! best tables better than suzzzzzzzys
I particularly like tables 4-16 at the Farley! :wink:
House!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
|
|
| chuckles |
Posted on 09-07-2008 06:29
|
Home From Home
Posts: 214
Joined: 07.10.07
|
Bink286 wrote:
Venues that don't sell proper beer (as opposed to poxy lager) should be deemed completely inappropriate to host league or cup games, and a 0-10 walkover given to the visiting team until they start serving proper beer on tap.
Venues that have taps for proper beer that fail to actually serve said beer, or serve said beer in a manner that can only be described as cloudy muck, tasting like flat washing up liquid, should be suspended from hosting games, and teams based in such establishments should be moved to Rileys on Imperial Way until their landlord 'sorts it out'.
I resent spending my hard earned wedge on gnats' piss and or to line the pockets of landlords/management who cannot even begin to manage the basic principles for keeping, maintaining and serving proper ale.
Until these rules are brought in, I'm just going to keep driving to away venues and paying through the nose for mixers and cordials, making the landlords/management even more money and providing plenty of disincentive for them to not bother with changing anything at all whilst they rake in the profits from watered down over-priced limonades.
So there!
DSB
Dead Spot Bollock.
There can never be too much real English Beer. As oposed to the foreign muck they serve at most, so called English Pubs.
Always have a plan 'B'
Even plan 'B' has failed |
| |
|
|
| chuckles |
Posted on 09-07-2008 06:42
|
Home From Home
Posts: 214
Joined: 07.10.07
|
chuckles wrote:
Venue Vetting three sets of five and the minute rule brought in.
Oh, and I'd make it Scotch Doubles
Always have a plan 'B'
Even plan 'B' has failed |
| |
|
|
| chuckles |
Posted on 09-07-2008 06:45
|
Home From Home
Posts: 214
Joined: 07.10.07
|
chuckles wrote:
chuckles wrote:
Venue Vetting three sets of five and the minute rule brought in.
Oh, and I'd make it Scotch Doubles
And I'd Make it best of 5 from the 3rd round of the singles. Maybe making it longer as the Comp went on.
Always have a plan 'B'
Even plan 'B' has failed |
| |
|
