|
CSL IV - KO Cup Round 1 Results
|
| Fat-Dart |
Posted on 08-05-2009 16:05
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
Martin Drinkwater 6 - Marc Rowson 4
Martin Duncan 7 - Darren Porter 6
Mick Huggins 6 - Luke Willsher 2
Jon Prothero 6 - Michael Hakow 0
Dan Reeks 3 - Paul Saxton 6
Mark Stallard 7 - Scott Slattery 6
Peter Knight 6 - Francois Tertullien 3
Lee Manister 4 - Mick Saunders 6
Lloyd Barnes -1 - John Hoy 6
Mark Miller 6 - Mark Vincent 1
Tom Telford 6 - Paul Da Silviera 7
All first round losing players are automatically entered into the KO Plate, which will run alongside the main event.
Postponed Fixtures:
Phil Wates v Steve Aldridge - Table 10
Sarah Macmullen v Scott Bradwell - Table 6
Chris Knock v Shane St.Romaine - Table 11
N.B. Postponed matches must be played as soon as possible, as the draw for the next round cannot be done before all results are in.
Edited by Fat-Dart on 08-05-2009 20:40 |
| |
|
|
| miq |
Posted on 08-05-2009 18:57
|
Home From Home
Posts: 464
Joined: 05.10.07
|
Handicap system was a bit of a killer last night with only 2 Premier Division players through. I felt for Lloyd who was 4-1 down in what seemed like 15 minutes and his night was over with the scoreline of John 6 / Lloyd -1, that seems fair to me  |
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 08-05-2009 19:13
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Looks like the plate will be just as tough to win as the cup. |
| |
|
|
| Fat-Dart |
Posted on 08-05-2009 19:15
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
miq wrote:
Handicap system was a bit of a killer last night with only 2 Premier Division players through. I felt for Lloyd who was 4-1 down in what seemed like 15 minutes and his night was over with the scoreline of John 6 / Lloyd -1, that seems fair to me
As I said before, this is the first time CSL has had a KO element and a handicap system tested.
Lloyd himself said last night that the psychological effect of having to effectively win 8-4 to take it to tie-break was too much for him. It's harsh, but players don't stand a chance if they've convinced themself they have lost before a match has started.
(Also, you're not strictly correct, as Hughie and Charles are through (albeit with byes), as will the winner of Phil/Steve plus Chris still has to play Shane)
Edited by Fat-Dart on 08-05-2009 19:19 |
| |
|
|
| Dogger |
Posted on 08-05-2009 20:28
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 805
Joined: 02.10.07
|
Mark told me he lost 6-1 to miller not 6-4?
not that it matters lol |
| |
|
|
| Fat-Dart |
Posted on 08-05-2009 20:34
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
Dogger wrote:
Mark told me he lost 6-1 to miller not 6-4?
not that it matters lol
You're right and I've corrected it accordingly. |
| |
|
|
| miq |
Posted on 08-05-2009 20:48
|
Home From Home
Posts: 464
Joined: 05.10.07
|
(Also, you're not strictly correct, as Hughie and Charles are through (albeit with byes), as will the winner of Phil/Steve plus Chris still has to play Shane)
I'm aware of that, i'm talking about last night.  |
| |
|
|
| miq |
Posted on 08-05-2009 20:52
|
Home From Home
Posts: 464
Joined: 05.10.07
|
I want Fat-Dart in the next round, only have to give him a 2 start  |
| |
|
|
| Fat-Dart |
Posted on 08-05-2009 21:02
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
miq wrote:
(Also, you're not strictly correct, as Hughie and Charles are through (albeit with byes), as will the winner of Phil/Steve plus Chris still has to play Shane)
I'm aware of that, i'm talking about last night.
Glad you're aware of that, Michael, I'd hate to think you weren't 100% on the ball..
As a sad stato (and being off work with nothing better to do), here's a breakdown of divisional 'success' in the KO Cup so far:
Premier
Still in Main Event: 5 (+ possible 1)
Through to Plate: 4 (+ possible 1)
Division One
Still in Main Event: 5 (+ possible 1)
Through to Plate: 4 (+ possible 1)
Division Two
Still in Main Event: 4 (+ possible 2)
Through to Plate: 4 (+ possible 2)
The whole idea of a handicap system is to attempt to make the field a bit more level. Looking at those figures, it couldn't be much more level than that. |
| |
|
|
| miq |
Posted on 08-05-2009 21:31
|
Home From Home
Posts: 464
Joined: 05.10.07
|
Two bye wins for Premier players flatter your stats somewhat. |
| |
|
|
| Fat-Dart |
Posted on 08-05-2009 21:34
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
miq wrote:
Two bye wins for Premier players flatter your stats somewhat.
Granted, but I bet if the byes had been Div.2, they'd have been used as another example that it was an unfair system. The draw is random, so you get what you get. |
| |
|
|
| miq |
Posted on 08-05-2009 21:44
|
Home From Home
Posts: 464
Joined: 05.10.07
|
So speakth the Rt. Hon. M. Stallard MP.
Can you tell I'm bored at work on a Friday  |
| |
|
|
| Fat-Dart |
Posted on 08-05-2009 22:04
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
miq wrote:
Can you tell I'm bored at work on a Friday
.. and that I'm still unwell and bored of daytime tv at home. |
| |
|
|
| Chuckie |
Posted on 08-05-2009 22:20
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 114
Joined: 08.10.07
|
No one can say it?s unfair when I inevitably go on to win it.
Taking my shots looking cool, my self-esteem?s growing tall.
Losing eyes this game is cruel. I do my thing playing pool.
|
| |
|
|
| Sass |
Posted on 22-05-2009 06:01
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Late result : Sarah 6 - 3 Scott |
| |
|
