|
First Impressions ?
|
| harry |
Posted on 16-06-2008 13:10
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 615
Joined: 02.10.07
|
You could have just told me!
Harry Time! |
| |
|
|
| Luke |
Posted on 17-06-2008 00:34
|
Home From Home
Posts: 303
Joined: 06.03.08
|
harry wrote:
You could have just told me!
I could have done that but my way was quicker...for me I mean! |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 18-06-2008 19:19
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
So . . We've played at least 4 matches, including a KO Cup match where we have a 1-frame playoff . .
. . how are you all finding it so far?
Prefer it? Hate it? Like the fact you can easily play with 5 as much as 10? Like the one frame playoff? Like the new match distance? Finding it's running over timewise? |
| |
|
|
| Knocky |
Posted on 18-06-2008 19:50
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 716
Joined: 07.10.07
|
think its definaty the way forward,in fact loving it,and to cap it all off the unpredictables are top.
long may it last. ne:
summer champs 2008
div 1 individual winner 2008
and knockout cup winners 2008
croydon singles league iv prem winner
plus league cup winners 2011,2012.2014
plus ko cup plate winners 2011 summer doubles winners 2010winter league champs 2017
and lots of runner up trophys which have been given to local schools. |
| |
|
|
| Spud |
Posted on 18-06-2008 20:02
|
Home From Home
Posts: 468
Joined: 02.10.07
|
It's got everyone talking, which is a good thing.
I personally like the format.
I also like the newly established flexibilty with reagards to the playing order, and would prefer to see it stay that way if honest.
So long as the same two people don't play eachother, no worries.
I think it could do with a one man play off at the end of a 5-5 to determine a winner, as it's nice to feel victorious.
Time wise it's better. You get more pool for your evening, the landlords and club owners benefit from that aswell, and there is flexibility there for those who need it.
|
| |
|
|
| Welshy |
Posted on 18-06-2008 20:09
|
Home From Home
Posts: 479
Joined: 02.05.08
|
Think the new structure works out well. We had 5 turn up for the first section last night, one left to go to work and another turned up at the same time the other was leaving tp play the 2nd half.
Timewise we were all done by 9.20..all out attack play with no safeties/fudging in sight
Fortune Favours the Brave... |
| |
|
|
| Golden |
Posted on 18-06-2008 20:10
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1641
Joined: 10.09.07
|
10 frames by 9:20pm : |
| |
|
|
| Welshy |
Posted on 18-06-2008 20:13
|
Home From Home
Posts: 479
Joined: 02.05.08
|
Don't know how it happens, but so far 9.40 finish against the Folly, 10 against the Big Spuds and 9.20 yesterday against Chopper Squad. Heck our old games of 7 used to take longer, so if it speeds up everyones game, we're all for it.
Fortune Favours the Brave... |
| |
|
|
| Spud |
Posted on 18-06-2008 20:21
|
Home From Home
Posts: 468
Joined: 02.10.07
|
Expect a proposal to get the matches extended to best of 21 at the next AGM coutesy of the Beechtree then!!! |
| |
|
|
| SCORCHIO12 |
Posted on 18-06-2008 20:55
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 636
Joined: 11.10.07
|
I too like the format. However, we need an extra game if its 5-5 if bonus points are still in play come the winter.
|
| |
|
|
| Witt |
Posted on 18-06-2008 21:18
|
Getting The Hang Of It
Posts: 29
Joined: 08.10.07
|
In the Farley singles league, the matches are best of 8 with 3 bonus points for a win and 1 bonus point a piece for a draw. Is there any reason why this couldn't be introduced?
The other option could be instead of the play-off at 5-5, the secretaries game could be used as the 11th game. |
| |
|
|
| angles |
Posted on 18-06-2008 21:41
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 53
Joined: 09.10.07
|
I personally like the format as is, but as for playing an extra frame for glory would be wrong.
what I would like to see introduced is a scoring system the same as the football league, I,E 3pts per win 1pt per draw.Using the frame won and lost in the for and against column.
This i feel would make for an even more exciting league.
As for all knockouts there need be no need for any changes. |
| |
|
