|
propositions for division 1 next winter
|
| Chuckie |
Posted on 13-07-2013 23:24
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 114
Joined: 08.10.07
|
Make it 12 frames and continue to sneak it up to 15 at future AGMs. The illogical 11th frame finally makes sense to me.
Taking my shots looking cool, my self-esteem?s growing tall.
Losing eyes this game is cruel. I do my thing playing pool.
|
| |
|
|
| Teach |
Posted on 14-07-2013 13:58
|
Home From Home
Posts: 484
Joined: 16.10.07
|
Rather than looking at number of frames played, surely you need to look at number of players needed to fulfil a fixture. If we are sticking with a minimum of 5 players, then in reality you either stick with 11 frames or jump to 15. If you switch to any other number of frames, e.g. 12, 13, 14, then you are changing the number of players required.
So surely, at the AGM, It's the minimum number of players needed to play all frames in a match that needs to be voted on first.
Knockout Cup Winners 2011, 2014 
Division One Summer Champs 2011, 2012, 2015 |
| |
|
|
| Metin250 |
Posted on 15-07-2013 03:02
|
Home From Home
Posts: 369
Joined: 20.05.10
|
Getting boring now, vote and stop chatting!
YNWA |
| |
|
|
| No1 Nugget |
Posted on 18-07-2013 18:10
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 794
Joined: 28.10.09
|
after reading all I want to put in a proposal for 14 games,
so we can have draws back 7 v 7 and a 1 point bonus for a draw, and 2 points for a win bonus, then everybody happy, more frames and draws and I know a few were discussing to bring in bonus points, which is also I good idea, so who really wants to 2nd it as we need to asap before the agm............................
Division 2 winter league champs
division 3 and 2 summer league runner up,
division 3 champs
division 4 summer champs
division 5 winners
division 5,4,3 divisional singles winner
division 5,4 secretary winner |
| |
|
|
| Triple C |
Posted on 18-07-2013 18:23
|
Home From Home
Posts: 278
Joined: 08.10.07
|
I think if this is put forward frames should be secondary. We should adopt a points system of 3pts for a win, 1 for a draw. A win is a win regardless of the score and will reflect better within the league over a season. |
| |
|
|
| Brooker |
Posted on 18-07-2013 19:37
|
Home From Home
Posts: 233
Joined: 08.10.07
|
14 frames at 2 x 7 per half would mean a team needing a minimum of 7 players. Considering the amount of teams, us included that seem to struggle to get 5 players at the moment i can't see that being voted in.
Should stay at 11 or moved up to 15 so 5 players would still make a team, i don't think 14 frames is a good proposal, for the sake of 1 frame you may as well elimate the opposition from teams with less than 7 players that you will definitely get at 14 frames & just go for 15 instead. the only opposition you will get then is from teams that don't want to increase the amount of frames.
I would rather be playing golf |
| |
|
|
| No1 Nugget |
Posted on 18-07-2013 21:55
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 794
Joined: 28.10.09
|
Chris you make a fair point in saying 5 minimum players  I think we should still keep it at that and the captain then has a choice who he plays for the final set of 4 games with only a possible 4 players playing 3 games a nite
Division 2 winter league champs
division 3 and 2 summer league runner up,
division 3 champs
division 4 summer champs
division 5 winners
division 5,4,3 divisional singles winner
division 5,4 secretary winner |
| |
|
|
| Brooker |
Posted on 23-07-2013 00:23
|
Home From Home
Posts: 233
Joined: 08.10.07
|
That could work, but i still think a straight change to 15 frames at 3 x 5 per set is your best bet, with no other changes, forget the bonus point & all the other stuff like 3 points for a win & scoth doubles & all that, the more confusing it is, the more likely people will not understand, lose interest & vote against it.
15 frames at 3 sets of 5 is simple & straightforward, you won't spend most of the night answering untold questions if you stick to that.
Think it won't get voted in regardless & for my own personal reasons am against increasing the frames anyway, but if it is going to change, a simple straight forward change is your best bet in my opinion.
I would rather be playing golf |
| |
|
