Doubles Round One
|
Sass |
Posted on 21-10-2008 04:35
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
First time many people will have played scotch doubles - as well as posting the scores it would be nice to hear what people thought of the format.
I love it!! :D
Graeme Witt & Simon Beams (Forum 'A') 0 - 2 Edi Tuckova and Sarah Long (Floozies)
Edited by Sass on 21-10-2008 05:06 |
|
|
|
Faz Da Fisher |
Posted on 21-10-2008 05:21
|
Home From Home
Posts: 299
Joined: 08.07.08
|
Farron rowe and barry watkins 2-0 cathy fox and diane Williams played match in good humour some of us getting reeled in eh cathy and a cheeky one handed black blessed and ended the match looking forward to the next round
I think I got a bite ... And it's a big one |
|
|
|
hannahfish |
Posted on 21-10-2008 06:20
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 198
Joined: 05.10.07
|
um well one frame took some people an hour to play lol |
|
|
|
Sniper |
Posted on 21-10-2008 16:59
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 52
Joined: 22.04.08
|
hannahfish wrote:
um well one frame took some people an hour to play lol
Who was that then
Edited by Sniper on 21-10-2008 17:01 |
|
|
|
longshanks |
Posted on 21-10-2008 17:37
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 709
Joined: 07.10.07
|
I witnessed the end of it. Paul Saxton's game. I think Paul's team played 338 df's in a row.
I much prefer this format, but I think you need to be on the same wavelength as your partner.
|
|
|
|
Fat-Dart |
Posted on 21-10-2008 18:29
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
longshanks wrote:
I much prefer this format, but I think you need to be on the same wavelength as your partner.
Which Billy and I witnessed last night first hand, especially in the final frame where you both cleared up very nicely from our dry break. Good luck in the next round!
|
|
|
|
Sniper |
Posted on 21-10-2008 18:40
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 52
Joined: 22.04.08
|
longshanks wrote:
I witnessed the end of it. Paul Saxton's game. I think Paul's team played 338 df's in a row.
is that it - i thought it was more than that?
we did well to grind it out i think. |
|
|
|
Fat-Dart |
Posted on 21-10-2008 18:50
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1308
Joined: 05.10.07
|
Sniper wrote:
we did well to grind it out i think.
And WE did well to stay awake watching! |
|
|
|
longshanks |
Posted on 21-10-2008 18:50
|
Must Get Out More
Posts: 709
Joined: 07.10.07
|
Fat-Dart wrote:
longshanks wrote:
I much prefer this format, but I think you need to be on the same wavelength as your partner.
Which Billy and I witnessed last night first hand, especially in the final frame where you both cleared up very nicely from our dry break. Good luck in the next round!
Cheers Mark |
|
|
|
Sniper |
Posted on 21-10-2008 19:11
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 52
Joined: 22.04.08
|
Fat-Dart wrote:
Sniper wrote:
we did well to grind it out i think.
And WE did well to stay awake watching!
Blah Blah Blah |
|
|
|
Cue_Ball |
Posted on 21-10-2008 19:15
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 110
Joined: 09.10.07
|
Loved the format, it makes it much more interesting and makes you concentrate on every shot. I agree about being on the same wavelength though, it's important. |
|
|
|
Sass |
Posted on 21-10-2008 19:17
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
Edi and I kept apologising for the shots we were leaving eachother!!! I don't think you are really supposed to say anything to your partner while your 'team' is at the table but it's so hard not to apologise for a bad shot.
Still all over in 20 minutes and kids in bed at a reasonable time. Thanks again to our opponents for agreeing to play earlier in the evening and good luck in the Plate |
|
|
|
andye |
Posted on 21-10-2008 21:40
|
Home From Home
Posts: 394
Joined: 02.10.07
|
Sass wrote:
Edi and I kept apologising for the shots we were leaving eachother!!! I don't think you are really supposed to say anything to your partner while your 'team' is at the table but it's so hard not to apologise for a bad shot.
Still all over in 20 minutes and kids in bed at a reasonable time. Thanks again to our opponents for agreeing to play earlier in the evening and good luck in the Plate
you are supposed to confer... it's the whole point of scotch doubles...!!! |
|
|
|
Sass |
Posted on 21-10-2008 21:57
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
No the whole point is you don't confer during visits. That was made clear at the AGM. |
|
|
|
andye |
Posted on 21-10-2008 22:07
|
Home From Home
Posts: 394
Joined: 02.10.07
|
Sass wrote:
No the whole point is you don't confer during visits. That was made clear at the AGM.
i don't give a monkey's what was made clear at the agm... all i'm saying is the whole point of scotch doubles is to confer and be more of a team game... anyone who can't realize that is just plain thick...
i'm not doing the doubles but if i were then i'd be conferring one way or the other whether it'd be talking, in code or pointing to where i wanted the balls to be... |
|
|
|
Cue_Ball |
Posted on 21-10-2008 22:10
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 110
Joined: 09.10.07
|
haha great post Andy, I love the mentality.
But when you are good enough, you have planned your entire clearance at the beginning so no more conferring is needed anyway |
|
|
|
Cue_Ball |
Posted on 21-10-2008 22:29
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 110
Joined: 09.10.07
|
Imagine how long Jay's game would have lasted if they could have conferred on every shot?? |
|
|
|
Sass |
Posted on 21-10-2008 22:45
|
FORUM ADDICT!
Posts: 1804
Joined: 10.09.07
|
andye wrote:
Sass wrote:
No the whole point is you don't confer during visits. That was made clear at the AGM.
i don't give a monkey's what was made clear at the agm... all i'm saying is the whole point of scotch doubles is to confer and be more of a team game... anyone who can't realize that is just plain thick...
i'm not doing the doubles but if i were then i'd be conferring one way or the other whether it'd be talking, in code or pointing to where i wanted the balls to be...
Then you would be cheating. Just as well you're not in the doubles then! |
|
|
|
Sniper |
Posted on 22-10-2008 06:11
|
Quite The Regular
Posts: 52
Joined: 22.04.08
|
Cue_Ball wrote:
Imagine how long Jay's game would have lasted if they could have conferred on every shot??
|
|
|